Frampton v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Beckworti-i, Judge:
The merchandise involved in this case, described on the invoice as hard maple flooring, was imported from Canada and entered at the port of Detroit on November 21, 1963. It was assessed with duty at 16% per centum ad valorem under item 202.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as wood flooring, other. It is claimed to be dutiable at 4 per centum ad valorem under item 202.57, as hardivood flooring in strips and planks.
The pertinent provisions of the Tariff Schedules of the United States are as follows :
Wood flooring, whether in strips, planks, blocks, assembled…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Drittler v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- B. Axelrod & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- C. B. Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Dant & Russell Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.