Legal Opinion

John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 21, 1961No. C.D. 2285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

Paragraph 402, Tariff Act of 1930, contains a provision for “Maple (except Japanese maple) * * *: Flooring.” The plaintiff herein imported certain merchandise described in the invoices as “Selected High Grade Hard Maple lumber, dressed 4 sides and T&G.” The collector classified the merchandise under the foregoing provision of paragraph 402 and took duty at the rate of 4 per centum ad valorem under the modification thereof by the Presidential proclamation relating to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D.51802.

The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is not maple…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Robertson v. SalomonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frampton v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API