Legal Opinion
Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1942No. 9970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought an action against ap-pellee for infringement of a patent. Ap-pellee answered, trial was had, findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and filed, and judgment was entered dismissing the action. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
*205The question is whether we have jurisdiction of the appeal. Though not raised by the parties, the question is here and has to be decided. City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Credit Bureau of San Diego v. Petrasich, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 65, 67; Crockett v. United States, 9 Cir., 125…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Janus v. United States Ex Rel. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Neely v. Merchants Trust Co. of Red Bank, NJCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Fiske v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- The AstorianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Harold Yanow v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Wernet v. JurgensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Robert Louis Stevenson Apartments, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Harbridge v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.