Legal Opinion
Idaho Irrigation Co. v. Gooding
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 9, 1924No. 324 and 336PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
These are separate appeals by the respective parties from the same decree, 285 Fed. 453, in part affirming and in part reversing the Federal District Court for Idaho.
The Idaho Irrigation Company, Limited, is a corporation organized as a construction company for the purpose of reclaiming lands under the Carey Act, c. 301, § 4, 28 Stat. 422. The other appellants in No. 324 (appellees in No. 336) are trustees for bondholders of the Irrigation Company and certain intervening individual owners of land, who had purchased water rights after this suit was brought and a lis pendens filed. Appellees…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. Twin Falls-Salmon River Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Bennett v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Childs v. NeitzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Gerber v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Twin Falls Oakley Land & Water Co. v. MartensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Andrus v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Skinner v. Jordan Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Idaho ex rel. Andrus v. KleppeDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1976
- Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.