Lourence v. West Side Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiff appeals from judgment, after jury verdict, in favor of defendant in an action for damages for alleged water seepage from defendant’s canals on and adjacent to plaintiff’s property.
Questions Presented
1. Failure to give plaintiff’s instruction No. 4 concerning the effect of section 22099 of the Water Code.
2. Alleged error in instructions given:(a) On inverse condemnation.(b) On the application of section 22098, Water Code.(c) On “equally balanced” evidence.(d) On mitigation of damages.
Record
Plaintiff owns a 300-acre farm, approximately 3 miles west of the City of Tracy. It…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Yee v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984