Legal Opinion

Yeshiva University v. Edelman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter E. Hart, J.

Plaintiff moves as follows: To strike out paragraphs numbered 1 to 4 respectively of the amended answer of defendant Ethel M. Edelman, as well as each of the defenses and counterclaims (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 103); to strike out the entire amended answer (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 104); to strike out the separate defenses, and defenses and counterclaims, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice; for judgment on the pleadings (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 112; Civ. Prac. Act, § 476); and for the appointment of a Referee to take proof of plaintiff’s title and of the facts and circumstances…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kirschbaum v. . EschmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Chew v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Purdy v. McGarityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Nasmie Construction Co. v. QuasmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosanoff v. SkuraNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Greenberg v. Nusbaum's Department Store, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API