Legal Opinion

Rosanoff v. Skura

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClare J. Hoyt, J.

This motion raises a novel question that has its genesis in our complicated tax laws.

Plaintiffs sue on two causes of action, the first by one plaintiff in her capacity as ancillary executrix of a deceased partner for an accounting by the surviving partner and the second in that capacity as widow of the decedent in concert with the surviving children for partition of the partnership real property.

Defendant has interposed an affirmative defense to the action that avers that it would be inequitable to direct partition and sale of the real property because defendant’s tax liability on the sale…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chew v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Grody v. SilvermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Eisner v. CurielNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Moses v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Yeshiva University v. EdelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loughran v. CruickshankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Ferraro v. JanisNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API