Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Zalasky

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1938No. 6539PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This action is for damages for personal injuries sustained by appellant, who was plaintiff in the district court, by being struck by an automobile driven by respondent, Zalasky in the course of his employment by respondent, Washington Cut Glass Company, Inc. A demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained; appellant refused to further plead and judgment of dismissal was entered, from which this appeal was taken.

The amended complaint shows appellant was 20 years old at the time of her injury; that on or about April 24, 1937, at about 4:45 P. M., she was a passenger on a stage, traveling in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. DeatonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Donovan v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Davis v. Pac. Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Williamson v. NeitzelIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Flach v. FikesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Otts v. BroughIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Department of Finance v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hobbs v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API