Wing v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Karen Everts Wing was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. She argues the police prohibited her from accessing her cell phone, denying her the opportunity to talk with her attorney. Wing also argues that she did not knowingly and voluntarily waive her right to an independent chemical test. And she claims that she was unconstitutionally foreed to commit a crime when she had to choose between providing a breath sample and refusing to submit to the breath test. Finally, she argues the breath test was not a valid search incident to an arrest. For the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Svedlund v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Zsupnik v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Annas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
- Botson v. Municipality of AnchoragesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Kingman v. ArySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. HeimSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.