Legal Opinion

Leslie J. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., a Corporation Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., Individually and as Successor to the American Tobacco Company and Its Predecessor in Interest, British American Tobacco Industries, Plc, Maria Cannata v. Philip Morris Usa, Inc., AKA Philip Morris Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2005No. 03-55780Published

1Opinion of the Court

403 F.3d 631

Leslie J. GRISHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., individually and as successor to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees.

Maria Cannata, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Philip Morris USA, Inc., aka Philip Morris; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-55780.

No. 03-56018.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 29, 2005.

Frances M. Phares, Esq., Baum Hedlund, Los Angeles, CA, Martin Louis Stanley,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API