Legal Opinion

Sosna v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Defendant’s appeal is based on the theory that there is no substantial evidence to support the finding of the compensation authorities that claimant’s disability is causally related to the accident.

On April 29, 1957, claimant filed his claim petition alleging that on January 22, 1957, while turning a station wagon on a turntable, he suffered a sprain of his back and was disabled since January 25, 1957. At the hearing the date of the accident was set as January 21, 1957. Defendant denied the allegations and the matter was heard by the referee who concluded that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Litman v. LitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Hager v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Kish v. T. F. Steele Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Mosley v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Traino v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mohler v. COOKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Moore v. MacArthur Pile Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Connelly Containers, Inc. v. GahanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API