Legal Opinion

Connelly Containers, Inc. v. Gahan

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1973No. Appeal, No. 245 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The notable feature of this workmen's compensation cause is that it is, and has been for five years, in a procedural snarl of unprecedented dimensions.

The claimant, Frank J. Gahan, was employed by Connelly Containers to “[take] care of the tool room in conjunction with the boilers and the plant, the heating of the plant and the process steam of the plant and other minor duties attached to that.”1 The plant was shut during the last week of the year 1963 and Gahan and others were mending or installing asbestos coverings on boiler pipes. The claimant asserts that on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buck v. ArndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GuzmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bernard S. Pincus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API