Hager v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ervin, J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation appeal. The Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed the referee and found in favor of the claimant. The court below affirmed the award.
The board having found in favor of the claimant, we are obliged to review the evidence in the light most favorable to the claimant and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable inference deducible therefrom. Santillo v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 266, 124 A. 2d 657.
Percy Hager was employed by the defendant as a shot firer in its coal mine. On Friday, December 8,1950 a fifty-ton rock…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Simon v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Lemmon v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Balaban v. SevereSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fenstermaker v. BodamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Munns v. Easthome Furniture Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Leftwrich v. Colonial Aluminum Smelting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Finch v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.