Legal Opinion

Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1966No. Appeal, No. 34PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal from the remand order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 6 of Philadelphia County, in a workmen’s compensation case, by the claimant-appellant, Willie James Barber. The remand order held that the findings of the Board were not supported by sufficient legally competent evidence and directed the Board to find facts in accordance with the court’s opinion.

*233The appellees, Fleming-Raugh, Inc., the employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, its insurance carrier, filed a motion to quash the appeal from the remand order as being interlocutory. Ordinarily this is so.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Falls v. Tenn. Furn. Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Wance v. Gettig Engineering & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API