McKeeman v. General American Life Insurance
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Juanita McKeeman sued for breach of an insurance contract. After Juanita presented her evidence at trial, the district court dismissed the case pursuant to NRCP 41(b) for failure to prove a sufficient case. Juanita asserts that dismissal was improper because she presented prima facie proof of waiver and estoppel upon which the jury could have granted relief. We agree and reverse the dismissal.
FACTS
The following evidence was presented at trial. In August 1985, appellant’s husband, Myron Dennis McKeeman (Dennis), obtained a $250,000 term life insurance policy from respondent…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Townsend v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Fernandez v. AdmirandNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Page v. Washington Mutual Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PHL Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Hudson v. Horseshoe Club Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Vasily v. Mony Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. MendenhallNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Assad v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.