Legal Opinion

Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mendenhall

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1997No. 27451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

John C. Clark, under the alias Thomas Pécora, rented a 1994 Lexus from Alamo Rent-A-Car on December 21, 1994. Clark failed to return the car to Alamo and obtained a California “quick title” using forged signatures of fictitious parties. Clark then advertised the car in the Las Vegas Review Journal newspaper and subsequently sold the car to Terry and Vyonne Mendenhall (Terry and Vyonne or the Mendenhalls) for $34,000.00 in cash on January 9, 1995. The Mendenhalls then made improvements to the car, had it insured, smog and safety tested, registered, licensed, and titled in the state of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Suburban Motors, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Godfrey v. GilsdorfNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cooper v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. McKeeman v. General American Life InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Motors Insurance Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. Arcadia Financial Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Executive Cars, LLC v. Western Funding, II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. Kenneth Bantum v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Hoffman-Laroche, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation John Does I-VCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API