Legal Opinion

London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1923No. S. F. No. 10335PublishedCited by 32 opinions

PROCEEDING on Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Award annulled. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an application for a writ of review of an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, made to defendant M. Schottik, an employee of Hinz & Landt, a corporation doing business in San Francisco, and against the petitioner, London Guarantee & Accident Company, the insurance carrier. The proceeding before the commission was dismissed as to the employer.

The pertinent facts may be stated to be that M. Schottik was employed by Hinz & Landt in the capacity of assistant manager. He was injured on April 1, 1922, under the following circumstances: Having some important figuring to do for his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Irwin-Neisler & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Makins v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API