Legal Opinion
Franklin Lodge v. Marcoux
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 13, 2003No. 2002-571PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The respondent, Franklin Lodge of Elks (Franklin Lodge or Lodge), appeals from an order of the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) affirming a decision of the New Hampshire Commission for Human Rights (commission) which awarded the petitioners, Sally Marcoux, Terry Bergeron-Hoyt, Renee LaBonte and Joann LaBonte, compensatory damages for the Lodge’s discrimination against them. See RSA 354-A:17 (Supp. 2002). We affirm.
I
The following facts are undisputed. Franklin Lodge is a local chapter of a nationwide benevolent organization which raises money to donate to various charities. During the relevant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Lakeman v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
- United States v. Lansdowne Swim ClubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Thorpe v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lassonde v. StantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Everitt v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- General Insulation Co. v. Eckman ConstructionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Hair Excitement, Inc. v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Human Rights Commission v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.