Everitt v. General Electric Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
This interlocutory appeal, see Sup. Ct. R. 8, was brought by direct defendants, Town of Hooksett (Town), Owen Gaskell and Keith Lee, and third-party defendant Jeremiah Citro, from two rulings of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.). The first denied the direct defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeking immunity from the negligence claim brought by the plaintiff, Sarah Everitt, and the second denied Citro’s motion to dismiss the third-party claims against him. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
I
The following facts are taken from the interlocutory appeal statement, unless otherwise…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cameron v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Mlodzinski Ex Rel. J.M. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- John Farrelly v. City of Concord & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Ojo v. LorenzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. HESS CORP.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.