Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Zletz
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 25, 1970No. Misc. No. 54PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
This Court’s jurisdiction is invoked under 35 U.S.C. § 24 to make certain rulings regarding taking of testimony in Wilmington, Delaware, in Patent Interference 89,634 pending in the United States Patent Office. The Party Hogan calls on the Court to compel answers to certain questions put to Dr. Roberto Pirani, a witness of the Party Natta, on cross examination, and to dissolve an order impounding certain testimony of Dr. Giuseppe de Varda, also a witness of the Party Natta, taken on cross examination.
Although the Court’s determination of these…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- In re RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frilette v. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Standard Oil Company of Indiana v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Vincent J. Frilette, and Paul R. Weisz, Movants-Appellants v. Charles N. Kimberlin, Jr., and Elroy M. Gladrow, Opposers. Richard J. Duffy v. Gerald Barnes, Joseph R. Preziosi, William F. McGuinness James B. Duke,richard A. Craig, Charles C. Faroni, Richard Baubles and Donald Sager,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.