Legal Opinion

In re Rogoff

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1951No. 113, MiscellaneousPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Julian Rogoff, moved, prior to this, for an order compelling Respondents, William S. Watts and Franklin H. Wells, to answer certain questions propounded to them in depositions being taken in Interference No. 83,667, now pending in the United States Patent Office. On December 14, 1950, this Court filed an opinion and an order denying Petitioner’s motion. D.C., 94 F.Supp. 377.. Petitioner now files a petition for a rehearing on and reconsideration of the motion which was denied.

Petitioner now contends that the decision of this Court, refusing to grant an order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Creed v. PottsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Fishburn v. VincentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  3. Koch v. LieberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. Application of RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Isom v. DubbsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Hogan v. ZletzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API