Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Durham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 14, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Stites —

Reversing.

This is a proceeding under chapter 22 of the Acts of 1932 (Ky. Stats, secs. 186c-6 and 186c-7, 1933 Supplement) for the approval of a proposed issue of bonds necessary to fund the floating indebtedness of the city of Richmond. It is alleged and proved that a part of the indebtedness sought to be funded consists in an item of $14,378.08 representing a valid emergency overexpenditure in connection with the construction of sewers and a sewer disposal plant during the years 1928 and 1929. An itemized statement of every expenditure made in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Bartlett v. Louisville Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. City of Covington v. O. F. Moore Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. Board of Education of Bell CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Woford v. WofordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Geveden, Etc. v. Fiscal Court of Carlisle CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Stepp's Administrator v. PauleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API