Legal Opinion

Crum v. Fillers

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 9, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

This controversy is presented by.a petition in the above-styled cause for an attachment of the said Thomas Fillers to answer for a contempt alleged to have been committed by him in violation of the injunction contained in the final decree pronounced in said cause enjoining him from in any way interfering with or obstructing ingress or egress to petitioner’s spring.

It was denied that there had been any violation of the injunction; that any valid decree had ever been entered in the chancery court or in said cause; that the chancery court had any jurisdiction in the cause to entertain the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TrueTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Beitman v. HopkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. Taylor Implement & Vehicle Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Powell-Sanders Co. v. CarssowIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hicks v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  2. Howard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Frumin v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  4. Russell v. Tennessee & Kentucky Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Cobb v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API