Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
The California Constitution provides: “If provisions of 2 or more measures approved at the same election conflict, those of the measure receiving the highest affirmative vote shall prevail.” (Const., art. II, § 10, subd. (b). Hereafter, section 10(b).)1 Rules of statutory construction, however, require an attempt to reconcile statutory provisions relating to the same subject matter whenever possible in order to avoid conflict and give effect to every provision. The threshold question in this case is whether section 10(b) either permits application of these rules of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.