Legal Opinion

Helgeson v. City of Marysville

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 24, 1994No. 33218-0-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pekelis, A.C. J.

Melvin and Edith Helgeson (the Helge-sons) appeal the denial of their motion for summary judgment and the grant of the City of Marysville’s (the City or Marysville) cross motion for summary judgment. The Helge-sons contend that their motion should have been granted, arguing that the 1978 Stipulation of Settlement (the settlement), in which they expressly waived their right to any payment of medical services under RCW 41.26, the Washington Law Enforcement Officers’ and Fire Fighters’ Retirement System Act, Plan I (LEOFF I), was void ab initio. They further contend that the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Del Guzzi Constr. Co. v. Global Northwest Ltd., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Jacoby v. Grays Harbor Chair & Mfg. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TKWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re the Marriage of HammackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. City of Pasco v. Department Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Pasco v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Bankston v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API