Legal Opinion

City of Pasco v. Department Retirement Systems

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2002No. 26642-3-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

— The City of Pasco Fire Department (City) seeks review of the Department of Retirement Systems’ (Department) Final Order and the subsequent trial court ruling that affirmed the retroactive transfer of Cary D. Andres’ retirement benefits from Plan 2 to Plan 1 of the *584Law Enforcement Officers’ and Fire Fighters’ Retirement System (LEOFF). We affirm.1

FACTS2

I. Enrollment in LEOFF Plan 1

The City employed Andres as a fire fighter on June 5, 1974. He was enrolled in LEOFF (Plan 1) and began paying contributions into this retirement system, subject to being certified as having met minimum medical and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. LessleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pasco v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. ZDI Gaming, Inc. v. Washington State Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Zdi v. State Ex Rel. State Gambling Com'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Fox v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Tucker v. DEPARTMENT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API