Legal Opinion
Armour and Company v. Wilson & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 21, 1958No. 56 C 1206PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, District Judge.
This matter came on to be heard on the complaint and the answer thereto.
Involved in this action are two patents, namely, Patent No. 2,669,537, known as the Thompson patent, and Patent No. 2,669,536, known as the Bunding patent.
The court has heard the testimony of the witnesses, has examined and considered the exhibits offered and received in evidence, and has heard oral argument of counsel. Upon careful consideration of the record in this cause, as well as of the plaintiff’s objections to proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law submitted herein by defendant, the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Alamance Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Nordson CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- ICE CORPORATION v. Armco Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.