Legal Opinion
ICE CORPORATION v. Armco Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (1) and 12(b) (6), 28 U.S.C. The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that defendants’ patent is invalid and not infringed.
The plaintiffs are Intercontinental Enterprises, a German corporation having its principal office in Germany, and I. C. E. Corporation, a New York corporation having its principal place of business in New York. I. C. E. is a subsidiary of plaintiff Intercontinental. Defendant Armco Steel Corp, is an Ohio corporation and defendant International Nickel Co. is a Delaware…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Briggs v. United Shoe MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. LeBleuDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- ICE CORPORATION v. Armco Steel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Components, Inc. v. Western Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1979
- Nippon Elec. Glass Co., Ltd. v. SheldonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- JFD Electronics Corp. v. Channel Master Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.