Mahopoulus v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri
On Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this action, an alien, citizen, subject, inhabitant, and resident of the kingdom of Greece, on *166September 17, 1908, commenced this action in the circuit court of Jackson county, this state, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a corporate citizen of the states of Illinois and Iowa, the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a corporate citizen of the state of Illinois, and Harvey Smith and James J. Harrington, natural citizens of this state, and, respectively, train conductor and engineer in the employ of defendant the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Sheldon v. SillSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Turner, Administrator of Stanley, in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1912
- Louisville & N. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1914
- Sagara v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1911
- Barlow v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.