Barlow v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa
On Petition for Rehearing on Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
A motion by plaintiff to remand this ca'use to the state court for want of jurisdiction of this court was denied November 6, 1908, for reasons stated in an opinion filed that day. 164 Fed. 765.' Upon publication of the opinion of Judge Pollock in Ma-hopoulus v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co." (C. C.) 167 Fed. 165, in which a contrary view to that held by this court is taken of facts identical with those in this case, the plaintiff filed a petition for rehearing, relying wholly upon the opinion in the Mahopoulus Case in support of his petition. The great respect…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Barrow Steamship Co. v. KaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & N. R.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1912
- Louisville & N. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1914
- Sagara v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1911
- Bagenas v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1910
- H. J. Decker, Jr., & Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.