Legal Opinion
Liebman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1392PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Jay and Andrea Liebman bring this action pro se challenging the judicial foreclosure of their property as well as the servicing of their mortgage prior to the foreclosure. Presently before the Court are several motions to dismiss filed by various groups of Defendants in this case. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, 1 the applicable authorities, and the entire record, the Court shall GRANT (1) Defendant Judge Schumacher’s [25] Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint with Prejudice, (2) Defendants Ocwen…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Fontaine v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Canen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Ananiev v. FreitasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Laverpool v. Taylor Bean & Whitaker Reo LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.