Legal Opinion
Ananiev v. Freitas
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0341PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Vesko Ananiev, who is proceeding pro se, brings this lawsuit against ten unidentified “Doe” defendants and ten named defendants — the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department, as well as Sheriff Steven Freitas and Sheriffs Deputy Kathryn Straley, in both their personal and official capacities (collectively the “Law Enforcement Defendants”); Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), Aurora Loan Services LLC (“ALS”), and Aurora Bank, FSB (“Aurora Bank”) (the “Bank Defendants”); and Rosenthal Withem & Zeff, Michael D. Zeff, Michael…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Segelstrom v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Canen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hamilton v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, National AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Walsh v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, NaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bid Solve, Inc. v. Cws Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.