Legal Opinion
Liberte Capital Group v. Capwill
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 7, 2002No. 5:99CV818PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on the sole issue of the method of disbursement with regard to the Liberte class investors. Jurisdiction in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. After careful consideration of the parties’ positions and for the reasons stated below, the Court finds that a pro rata method of disbursement with regard to the certified class is appropriate. In addition, the Court certifies an immediate appeal of this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
II. Background
A. Case Chronology
This case revolves around the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,021 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Larry D. Blavin, D/B/A Providence Investment AdvisoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re City of Memphis, West Tennessee Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Zellner Construction Company, Inc. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liberte Capital Group, Llc, Alpha Capital Group, LLC v. James A. Capwill, Janet E. Mohnkern, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. CapwillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. CapwillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Javitch v. CapwillDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.