Radman v. Flanders Corp.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
' 1 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Ivan Radman, Janet Radman, Donna Smylie, Peter Radman, Joanne Crook, Bronte Clark, Martin Radman, and Jordan Radman (collectively, the Radmans) appeal various aspects of the trial court's decision on the counterclaim presented below. Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Flanders Corporation (Flanders) appeals the court's decision regarding the Radmang' original claim. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
[ 2 In November 1997, the parties entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement) whereby Flanders exchanged some of its restricted…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Robertson's Marine, Inc. v. I4 Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Lawrence v. Mountainstar HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.