Legal Opinion
Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 82-2277PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUNE L, GREEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to compel answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories 1—9, 11-12, 14-15, and 18, defendant’s opposition thereto and the entire record herein. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs motion to compel answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories 1-9, 11-12,14-15, and 18. For clarity, the Court adopts the organizational format of plaintiff's motion.
I. GENERAL OBJECTIONS
General Objection B
Defendant objects to portions of three interrogatories, 1, 2, and 11,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Miller v. Doctor's General HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Hubbard v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Mastie v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marker v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- White v. Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Owens v. Sprint/United Management Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- McBride v. Medicalodges, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Bell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.