Legal Opinion

Forehand v. International & G. N. R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1933No. 7883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCDBND'ON, Chief Justice.

Forehand sued the railroad company for damage to an automobile which was struck by one of the latter’s trains at a public crossing. An insurance company intervened, setting up a lien upon the automobile. The jury found in answer to a special issue that “collision in question constituted an unavoidable accident”; and upon this finding the judgment was for the railroad company. The insurance company recovered against Forehand for its debt and foreclosure of its lien. Forehand has appealed; but since no attack is made upon the insurance company’s recovery, that phase of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stedman Fruit Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Pratley v. Sherwin-Williams Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Puckett v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. El Paso Electric Co. v. BeckmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Sterling v. Community Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API