Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1929No. 12082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

Appellee, E. L. Patton, on June 23, 3.927, borrowed from appellant, Ray Puckett, $200, and executed therefor two notes, one in the principal sum of $200, payable $40 per month, together with interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, and as security executed a chattel mortgage on i a Dodge automobile. ' '

Appellee instituted this suit, alleging that he had made two payments of $40 each on the $200 note, and, not being able to pay the third payment, secured an extension of the payment for 30 days, but that, before the expiration of the 30-day extension, appellant had wrongfully,'…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodard v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Forehand v. International & G. N. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Lone Star Finance Corp. v. HackworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Damants v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Mauriceville National Bank v. Zernial, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API