Pratley v. Sherwin-Williams Co. of Texas

The question for decision in this case is clearly stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Looney [21 S.W.(2d) 321, 323] as follows :

“There is but one question presented on this appeal, which was tersely stated by Judge Vaughan in the majority opinion, as1 follows: ‘In order to dispose of the question before us, it is only necessary to discuss the authority of Judge Beard to make the order extending the time for filing the statement of facts SO days, as entered by him. If Judge Beard, under the law, had the authority to make said order, then plaintiff in error was' wrongfully deprived of his…