Grandchamp v. McCormick
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair; Law, J. Bill by Frank Grandchamp and others against George McCormick, drain commissioner, to enjoin the construction of a drain. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.
Complainants filed their bill of complaint in the circuit court for St. Clair county, in chancery, against defendant county drain commissioner. The purpose of the suit is to perpetually restrain the construction of a certain drain established under the general *233drain laws. To this bill a demurrer was interposed by-defendant for the reasons:
First. Because complainants have a full, adequate and sufficient remedy at law
Second. Because complainants should have proceeded by certiorari and having failed to do so, the bill of complaint cannot be maintained.
Third. Because the several matters alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Auditor General v. BoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Crandall v. McElhenyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Hudlemyer v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Old National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Township of Clarence v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Cummings v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Toledo, Saginaw & Muskegon Railway Co. v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Troost v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.