Loughner v. Schmelzer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by.
Mr,Chief Justice Bell,
The sole question in this case is a narrow one. In an action of trespass for damages resulting from a collision of two automobiles is it a reversible error to admit, over plaintiffs’ objection, evidence that the plaintiff was convicted before the Quarter Sessions Court of a violation of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959.,' P. L. .58, §1004, 75 P.S. §1004, namely, failure to drive on the right half of the highway?* We hold that evidence of the conviction of a traffic violation or of small misdemeanors is not admissible in a civil suit for dhm*285ages arising…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Kravitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Mineo v. Eureka Security Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Stumpf v. NyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Cusatis v. ReichertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Crane v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.