Legal Opinion

Loughner v. Schmelzer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1966No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by.

Mr,Chief Justice Bell,

The sole question in this case is a narrow one. In an action of trespass for damages resulting from a collision of two automobiles is it a reversible error to admit, over plaintiffs’ objection, evidence that the plaintiff was convicted before the Quarter Sessions Court of a violation of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959.,' P. L. .58, §1004, 75 P.S. §1004, namely, failure to drive on the right half of the highway?* We hold that evidence of the conviction of a traffic violation or of small misdemeanors is not admissible in a civil suit for dhm*285ages arising…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Kravitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Mineo v. Eureka Security Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Stumpf v. NyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Cusatis v. ReichertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Crane v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API