Legal Opinion

Mineo v. Eureka Security Fire & Marine Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

We are. faced here with the question of whether this Court .should permit recovery, from insurance com*77panies for a fire loss, when this Court has already held that the insureds were properly convicted of procuring the burning of the property for which recovery is sought.

Joseph S. Tomaino and Thomas Preño were proprietors of a restaurant in Scranton which was destroyed by fire on October 17, 1948. The proprietors were convicted of criminally setting the fire and sentenced to the penitentiary. Their conviction was sustained by this Court in Com. v. Tomaino, 168 Pa.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. HellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  2. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Burt v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Elia v. OlszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Teslovich Et Ux. v. Fire. F. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. FettersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Hurtt v. StironeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API