Legal Opinion

Kimmell v. Burns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

This was a suit to enforce a vendor’s lién on a forty-acre tract of land which formerly belonged to the *371inhabitants of one of the congressional townships of Noble county.

The complaint charged that, on the 11th day of December,. 1855, one Hardenbrook purchased the land of the proper officer at a specified price, and received a certificate of his purchase in due form; that afterwards Cyrus Kimmell, the plaintiff, became the holder and owner of this certificate by assignment; that, after becoming such holder and owner— that is to say, on the 12th day of April, 1866 — the plaintiff sold,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Kilgore v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Newcomer v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. McCauley v. HoltzIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Burns v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaPlante v. ConveryIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API