LaPlante v. Convery
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The proceedings in this case, occurring prior to the act of 1881 relating to the settlement of decedents’ estates, are governed by the act upon that subject of 1852. The facts material to be stated are as follows:
In 1876 Gerhard Reiter and his wife executed a mortgage upon his real estate to the appellant to secure a note, then given by said Gerhard to the appellant, in the sum of $5,225, payable two years after date, with ten per cent, interest. Reiter died without paying any of this debt. His wife survived him. *500Appellee Convery was appointed administrator of Reiter’s estate. As such…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lofton v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Newcomer v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- McCallam v. PleasantsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Sparrow v. KelsoIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Sparrow v. KelsoIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Bachtenkircher, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Swift v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Denton v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Ditton v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Quirk v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.