Legal Opinion

McCauley v. Holtz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom tlie Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriddle, J.

This suit is brought by David, Holtz, against Alexander McCauley, on a promissory note made by him to Holtz, to recover judgment on the note and to enforce a vendor’s lien against certain real estate, in part payment for which it is alleged the note was given.

Answer, general denial; trial by the court; finding for the appellee.

Over the usual motions and exceptions, the court rendered judgment for the amount of the note, and decreed the sale of the land to pay it, and, in default of its sufficiency, that execution issue for the balance.

Heither the complaint nor the evidence, which is all…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Amory v. ReillyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Brumfield v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  3. Haugh v. Blythe's ExecutorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Wasson v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Fisher v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Nutter v. FouchIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Evans v. FeenyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Overly v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Gerstell v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API