Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
The Federal Arbitration Act states that a "written provision" in a contract providing for "settle[ment] by arbitration" of "a controversy ... arising out of" that "contract ... shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation *466of any contract." 9 U.S.C. § 2. We here consider a California court's refusal to enforce an arbitration provision in a contract. In our view, that decision does not rest "upon such grounds as exist ... for the revocation of any contract," and we consequently set that judgment aside.
I
DIRECTV, Inc., the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Badgerow v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Kindred Nursing Ctrs. Ltd. P'ship v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Craig Zuber v. BoscovsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.