Legal Opinion

East Hoquiam Boom & Logging Co. v. Neeson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1898No. 2909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Ghehalis County.—Hon. Charles H. Ayer, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tbe opinion of tbe court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This action was brought to foreclose four liens wbicb plaintiff claimed it was entitled to by reason of having rendered and performed certain services upon respondent Heeson’s logs in sluicing, sacking, driving, assorting, delivering and booming tbe same. Tbe trial in *143the lower court resulted iu a judgment dismissing the action and for costs, and the plaintiff has appealed therefrom.

The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of this state relating to hoom companies, and became incorporated in March, 1895. Within ninety days after…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Huse v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Pound v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Dawson v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Kemp v. PutnamWashington Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API