Kemp v. Putnam
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The respondents, Clarence Kemp, West End Sportsmen’s Club, a corporation, and Washington State Sportsmen’s Council, a corporation, commenced this action to abate a public nuisance and restrain the appellants from interfering with respondent Kemp and members of the respondent corporations in the exercise of their right to fish the Quillayute and Bogachiel rivers.
Appellant Olga M. Anderson holds the record title to certain real property which she is selling by real-estate contract to appellants William R. Putnam and Eva J. Putnam, his wife. The Sol Due and the Bogachiel rivers join at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Donaldson v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Proctor v. SimWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Monroe Mill Co. v. MenzelWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Save a Valuable Environment v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Wilbour v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- MacKay v. MacKayWashington Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.