Legal Opinion
Unlandherm v. Park Contracting Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 17, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
A request for admissions pursuant to Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, is not subject to a motion to strike. Nekrasoff v. United States Rubber Co., D.C., 27 F. Supp. 953; Modern Food Process Co., Inc., v. Chester Packing & Provision Co., Inc., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 520. See Moore, Federal Practice, pp. 2660, 2661; cf. Banca Nazionale Di Credito v. Equitable Trust Co., 221 App.Div. 555, 224 N.Y.S. 617.
It may be noted, however, contrary to the defendant’s contention, that it has been held that the word “therein” as used in Rule 36 is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Nekrasoff v. U. S. Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Modern Food Process Co. v. Chester Packing & Provision Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- McCrate v. Morgan Packing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1939
- Banca Nazionale Di Credito v. Equitable Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Momand v. Paramount Pictures Distributing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. PayneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940