Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Apfel
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 11, 2001No. 6:00-cv-06227PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final deter mination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, was not entitled to disability benefits. Both plaintiff and the Commissioner have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Crv. P. 12(c). For the reasons outlined below, the Court grants the Commissioner’s motion and denies plaintiffs motion.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff James Jordan applied for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Maria TEJADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crowley v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Mikol v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Markle v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002