Legal Opinion
Mikol v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 2007No. 05 CIV 5355 WCCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
This is an action brought by plaintiff Bruce W. Mikol pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act (the “SSA”), to review the final determination of defendant Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) determining that plaintiff was not disabled from November 7, 2001 to October 21, 2004. Both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion is granted and her decision is affirmed.
BACKGROUND
I.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mikol v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Miller v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008